1) all appearance of separation, which now still lies on the work of Gentile conversion, especially on the education of the messengers, would be removed and thus many
3) The Gentile messengers themselves, raised in the mother church just like their fellow ministers, would feel themselves to be on an equal level and more closely connected to it, whereas they would now be viewed as inferior both by others and by themselves.
4) They would have access to those educational resources which are not offered to them in the constantly changing mission institutions, namely to the teaching of capable, thorough and lasting teachers, and to the books that are usually found in the university, as well as finally to the encouraging and educational company of hardworking and clever students.
5) If a Gentile messenger were, through the influence of foreign climes, or through age, or through something else, to be unable to proclaim the Gospel among the Gentiles any longer, he could, having been educated at a college, accept an office in the church of his fatherland; and it would have the great double advantage, firstly, that such a weak person could use his gifts and experiences to bring about great blessings at home. and secondly, the society would not need to ensure the preservation of him and his family, which it is undoubtedly obliged to do in the opposite case, when the Gentile messenger is excluded from ecclesiastical offices because of the nature of his education. This exclusion of the Gentile messenger, who was educated in a crooked institution, shows that the missionary matter, as it currently stands, is not ecclesiastical according to the judgment of the entire Protestant Church.
Answering the objections that are usually made against it.
[The pages