He: He would like to tell me his reasons in writing in a few days, as he now needs time to discuss them.
Me: Well, I just have to say it again that he is taking on someone else's responsibility. --
Another time, he said, admonishing me to be patient, he would have had the same thing with his bride before he could have received her parents' consent.
Me: Nobody else would have intervened then; I would also have the consent of my bride's parents, and I didn't need that of my guardians because I was of age. By the way, I would still like to accept his conscientiousness if he had been asked to attend the wedding; But I wouldn't have even thought of that, and nobody would have complained about it, and so on, and so on.
Dark and difficult is the path that you, my God, would have me walk; but certainly, You will illuminate and enlighten him. In this important matter, which You have promoted so far, grant me on the one hand wise moderation and on the other hand courageous determination, so that I may not harm myself or your cause either through passionate impatience or through tame, unmanly indulgence. Amen.
I am now curious about Kavel's reasons and Fiedler's answer to the question: whether he would give his consent to our engagement, even if Pastor Kavel persists in his opinion.